← Journal Policies

New Spring International Journal

Peer Review Policy

NSIJ uses structured scholarly peer review appropriate to the discipline and article type.
01

Review model

Research manuscripts normally undergo independent peer review after editorial screening.

Double-blind review is used where appropriate and practicable.

02

Reviewer selection

  • Relevant subject expertise
  • No material conflict of interest
  • Independent scholarly judgment
  • Geographic and institutional diversity where practical
03

Editorial decisions

Possible decisions include reject, major revision, minor revision and accept.

Editors consider the reviews alongside their own scholarly assessment. Reviewer recommendations inform but do not mechanically determine the editorial decision.